MyMitochondria — teal mitochondrion icon and my Mitochondria wordmarkScience & Health Powering Your CellsFind a Clinic
Latest edition · Mitochondrial medicine, translated without the hype
Research snapshot · Oct 19, 2026
Follow us on Google
Plain clinical-trial medicine bottles and a weekly pill organizer on a wooden table in morning light (illustrative image)
Watchdog Clinical trial

A yearlong trial just poured cold water on an NAD+ booster for Parkinson's

·

One of the most rigorous tests yet of the NAD+ longevity story just delivered a sobering result. The NOPARK trial — 410 people with early Parkinson's disease across 11 Norwegian centers — found that a full year of nicotinamide riboside (NR), a popular supplement that raises cellular NAD+ levels, did not slow the disease. Published in JAMA, the trial is the kind of large, careful study that can settle an argument — and this one settled against NR.

What the 410-person trial showed

Led by professor Charalampos Tzoulis at Haukeland University Hospital and the University of Bergen, NOPARK randomly assigned participants to NR or matching placebo for one year, with neither patients nor study teams knowing who got what. The biological rationale was strong: NAD is essential for cellular energy metabolism, DNA repair, and inflammation control, and smaller earlier studies had produced encouraging signals.

But the yearlong data were unambiguous. On the MDS-UPDRS scale — where higher scores mean more pronounced symptoms — the NR group worsened by an average of 2.45 points while the placebo group remained essentially unchanged. The adjusted difference of 2.72 points favored placebo: statistically significant, but below the commonly used threshold for a clinically important difference. Brain imaging showed no evidence that NR either slowed or accelerated changes in the dopamine system.

What it does — and doesn't — mean

The researchers were blunt about the takeaway: NR clearly increased NAD metabolism, but that did not translate into clinical improvement. They do not recommend that people with Parkinson's use NR or other NAD-boosting supplements outside controlled clinical studies.

What the result does not do is close the book on NAD+ biology. The findings do not rule out benefits in other diseases — effects may differ between conditions and need separate trials. And this is about a specific therapeutic claim (slowing Parkinson's), not the general wellness use of NAD+ precursors. But it is a useful reminder of the gap between a compelling mitochondrial mechanism and a proven treatment — exactly the gap this desk exists to patrol.

Where the evidence stands

Join the discussion

To get the conversation started: What questions does this story raise for you? Share them below — every comment is reviewed by our moderators before it appears.

Community discussion only — not medical advice. Every comment is reviewed by our moderators before it appears. Sign in with Google or a free Hyvor account to join in.

Follow MyMitochondria on Google

Site imagery: photographs and photographic-style imagery — illustrative only. People pictured are not patients, clinicians, endorsers, or cases described in our articles.